February 25, 2010 at 12:08 am - by Burden (4 Posts)
Ok, I'm fine with the first two winners, but ActiveFlaw as a winner?
I understand that it looks good but really come on! All they did was add text to a painting by some guy. Thats ALL the effort that they did. Seriously, no more then 5 minutes to pick a cool picture made by a professional artist and then add text to it.
Here is the submission:
Here is the font they used for ActiveFlaw
And as for finding the image? First page on google images....
Seriously, where is the execution in that (5 minutes in Photoshop?) Where is the CREATIVITY? That took little to no effort to find that picture and add text.
Please rethink your winners and judge them based on the criteria set by yourselves. And did you even look through the submissions? A majority of the finalists that were picked submitted their work on the last day. Did you look beyond the first 2 pages of submissions?